www.derf.net / movies / 20050705_The_Sting /
<< prev in "movie reviews" movie reviews next in "movie reviews" >>

The Sting   ...   movie reviews , spoiler_low
tue 2005-jul-05 18:21:08 pdt   ...   permalink


Sunday night we watched The Sting. I had seen it maybe seven years ago or so.

<spoiler detail="low">

So it was interesting seeing it already knowing the "twist". It felt like not very much was actually affected by it. By which I guess I mean, not that many scenes turned out to have a different subtext the second time. Or at least, I think. It was, as I said, many years ago that I saw it the first time. (I'm avoiding actually saying what the twist is, since I figure that the fact that there is a twist is less of a spoiler than what the twist is.)

But the fact that it was sort of the original con artist film, and so as a result so many other more recent con artist films also include some sort of twist, so that you know going in that they're going to be trying to trick you, so you look for the twist, and maybe you figure it out and maybe you don't... Um, not sure where I was going with the phrase "the fact that" at the beginning of that non-sentence. I guess that fact makes this not a very big spoiler.

</spoiler>

Anyway, you know, it's a classic and all that. It certainly deserves that status -- it's really well done. Paul Newman and Robert Redford are good of course, but Robert Shaw I thought gave an even better performance, albeit in a smaller role. Perhaps most worthy of note is that the script (and the film in general) still holds up as well as it does when compared to its more recent counterparts -- unlike certain other films from the 1970's, you don't have to point out how ground-breaking it was "back then".


mail me

name (required):

email (will be publicly viewable only if no URL given):

personal URL:
http://

remember name/email/URL in a cookie
don't save info in a cookie

comments (required):

NOTE: html tags cannot be included in the above. however, blank lines will separate paragraphs, and if you care, some rudimentary formatting is available with the following html-like tags (but note the square instead of angle brackets):

[b]bold[/b]
bold
[i]italic[/i]
italic
text[br]more text
text
more text
[quote]some quoted text[/quote]
some quoted text
[link url="http://www.example.com/"]somewhere else[/link]
somewhere else

NeilFred Picciotto drawing of neilfred
  • derf content, blog-style
  • derf's comics
  • elsewhere on the web
  • 100% true stories
  • what i learned today
  • random thoughts
  • movie reviews
  • . . . more . . .
  • Primer
  • A Home at the End of the World
  • Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
  • Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events
  • The Sting
  • Thirteen Conversations About One Thing
  • Napoleon Dynamite
  • In Good Company
  • The American Astronaut
  • . . . more . . .
  • phone photos
  • blog-on-blog action
  • tags
  • RSS feed
  • XFN links
  • recent comments
  • 2008-sep-22
  • Britt Lyons on food handler
  • Conrad Pate on singing nuns
  • Suzy on people live in West Virginia?
  • Quinn Rutledge on chickens
  • Jacquline Gamble on garlic rabbit
  • 2008-sep-21
  • Lenora Gomez on garlic rabbit
  • 2008-sep-20
  • Jonas Bailey on food handler
  • Lenny Ayers on chickens
  • random phone photo random phone photo
  • non-bloggy content
  • the derf himself
  • the derf FAQ
  • other derfs
  • what's new?
  • the derfnet portal
  • derf's comics
    blogs and such
  • Q
  • entropy
  • girlhacker
  • ambiguous
  • oblomovka
  • sem101
  • badgerbag
  • zephoria
  • pith, jcn
  • jvg
  • unlikely words
  • mjr
  • jessajune
  • heaneyland
  • dommah
  • unwellness
  • livejournalers
  • ...  all derf.net blog content and underlying code owned by NeilFred Picciotto  ...
    mail me